<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Astronomy Blog &#187; Large Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astronomyinfoblog.com/archives/tag/large-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.astronomyinfoblog.com</link>
	<description>Astronomy Fan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Neutrinos; A Small Slice of a Large Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomyinfoblog.com/archives/neutrinos-a-small-slice-of-a-large-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.astronomyinfoblog.com/archives/neutrinos-a-small-slice-of-a-large-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Large Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomyinfoblog.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright! Now we get to discuss neutrinos without h&#97&#118&#105ng me having to worry about being reduced to my co&#109&#112&#111nent parts. And while I think my component section&#115&#32&#97re lovely, I’m sure you would rather not go ther&#101&#46&#10Neutrinos are interesting tiny guys, meaning liter&#97&#108&#108y “neutral elementary particle”. An elementary&#32&#112&#97rticle is basically something which is not known t&#111&#32&#104ave [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright! Now we get to discuss neutrinos without h&#97&#118&#105ng me having to worry abou<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />t being reduced to my co&#109&#112&#111nent parts. And while I think my component section&#115&#32&#97<input type="hidden" />re lovely, I’m sure you would rather not go ther&#101&#46</p>&#10<p>Neutrinos are interesting t<s></s>iny guys, meaning liter&#97&#108&#108y “neutral elementary particle”. An elementary&#32&#112&#97r<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />ticle is basically something which is not known t&#111&#32&#104ave smaller components. We u<input type="hidden" />tilized to believe ato&#109&#115&#32were the smallest possible units of mass. Now we k&#110&#111&#119, <input id="tracker" type="hidden" />needless to say, that “atoms” are whopping M&#97&#115&#115ive units of mass.</p>
<p>When we st<input id="apps" type="hidden" />art off talking about&#32&#226&#128elementary particles”, you are truly referring &#116&#111&#32par<s></s>ticle physics. You easily get into leptons, bos&#111&#110&#115, positrons, muons, tau neutri<s></s>nos, and lots of oth&#101&#114&#32really cool words you swore in freshman algebra yo&#117&#226&#128d n<input id="phpint" type="hidden" />ever use.</p>
<p>Guess again.</p>
<p>Particle physics is als&#111&#32&#119here String Concept comes in, b<input id="stats" type="hidden" />ut we aren’t play&#105&#110&#103 around in THAT sandbox currently.<br />
<img src="http://tomsastroblog.com/images/2010/07/FirstNeutrinoEventAnnotated.jpg" alt="Large Apple" /><br />
Okay… here&#153&#115&#32the q<input type="hidden" />uite basics. You may accept that everything i&#115&#32&#99omposed of little elements, prop<input id="stats" type="hidden" />er? I mean, c’mo&#110&#32&#103uys. You swallowed atomic concept without gagging,&#32&#99&#111rrect?<input id="stats" type="hidden" /> You’re just going to possess to realize t&#104&#97&#116 an atom may be the apple, and it<input id="tracker" type="hidden" /> might be sliced &#97&#110&#100 diced into all kinds of tiny sections and pieces.&#32&#83&#111me of t<s></s>hese sections have a positive charge, some &#97&#32&#100amaging charge, and some are neutr<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />al. Still with m&#101&#63</p>&#10<p>You just certainly not realized how extremely many&#32&#112&#105eces and<input id="stats" type="hidden" /> components atoms might be sliced into.</p>
<p>De&#102&#105&#110itely, you’re additional than hal<input id="counter" type="hidden" />f-way there. Yo&#117&#32&#104ave the concept of atoms down, appropriate? You po&#115&#115&#101ss the en<input id="tracker" type="hidden" />tire negative/positive/neutral factor goi&#110&#103&#44 proper?</p>
<p>We’ll leave string theory<input id="tracker" type="hidden" /> for an additi&#111&#110&#97l day.</p>

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li>No related posts.</li>
	</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.astronomyinfoblog.com/archives/neutrinos-a-small-slice-of-a-large-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

